The Liar Paradox |
|---|
|
|
|
Epimenides was a Cretan himself. His statement therefore implies that he was a liar himself. If he is a liar, does that make his statement false? And if his statement is false, does that then mean that he is telling the truth? CONTINUE |
|
The paradox is best illustrated if one rewrites Epimenides' statement as:
|
|
In the simplist form, the paradox can be written: "All statements are false." A similar paradox is the well known maxim: "All rules have exceptions." Having read Epimenides' paradox, one can clearly see that the above statement is also self-contradictory. If all rules have exceptions, what about the rule that states that all rules have exceptions? The only exception that there can be to this rule is that at least one rule does not have an exception, and if that is true, it cannot also be true that all rules have exceptions. Should the maxim read "There's only one rule that has no exceptions (and this is it)"? CONTINUE |
|
The philosopher George Edward Moore was once asked whether he always told the truth. He replied that he did not. Bertrand Russell suggested that George Edward Moore only ever told one lie. CURIOUS? |
|
If you are interested to read more about paradoxes, "Aha! Gotcha Paradoxes to puzzle and delight" is a highly recommended book. CLICK HERE to email this puzzle to a friend. Please support this site by following any of the BOOK LINKS featured at curiouser.co.uk. Thank you. See also: The Liar Puzzle. Back to puzzle Index |
|
|
|
|